HEIGHTENED HATE - White supremacist groups double, civil rights groups report

E-mail Print
User Rating: / 6
PoorBest 

FACEBOOK, MYSPACE FUEL GROWTH OF ORGANIZATIONS DEDICATE TO HATE

By Allen McDuffee and Marisa Faitelson

The number of white supremacist organizations in the United States has more than doubled since the beginning of the decade, according to a recently issued report by a civil rights organization.

A study by the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights Education Fund concluded that since 2000 the number of U.S.-based white supremacist groups has increased 54 percent — fueled by the ease of communicating on the Internet and social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace.

The report, “Confronting the New Faces of Hate: Hate Crimes in America, 2009,” was produced by the LCCREF — a coalition of more than 200 organizations, a dozen of which contributed to this report.

The LCCREF report warns that although the election of President Barack Obama “appeared to close the book” on the history of inequality in America, a “spate of racially-motivated hate crimes and violence against minorities and immigrants that occurred before and after Election Day makes clear that a final victory over prejudice and racial hostility remains elusive.”

The LCCREF report, citing 2007 FBI statistics, points out that approximately 51 percent of the reported hate crimes were race-based, with 18.4 percent on the basis of religion, 16.6 percent on basis of sexual orientation and 13.2 on the basis of ethnicity. FBI statistics also reveal that the overwhelming majority of race-based crimes were directed against blacks (69 percent), followed by crimes against whites (19 percent), followed by crimes against Asians or Pacific Islanders (4.9 percent).

Driving the growth of extremists' groups is the ease of communication and building digital communities on the Internet. No longer limited to passing out leaflets on street corners, hate groups now reach potential audiences of millions by facilitating “communication among like-minded bigots across borders and oceans, anonymously and cheaply enhancing their ability to promote and recruit for their cause,” the report says.

Social networking sites also have bolstered the effort to recruit new members. According to the report, sites such as MySpace and Facebook, as well as extremist sites such as NewSaxon attract thousands of white supremacists, allowing like-minded individuals to form larger communities faster and more efficiently than web-based forums or discussion groups. The report cites the case of two white supremacists arrested in the fall of 2008 for plotting a racist shooting spree and assassination attempt on Obama who were reportedly introduced to each other by a mutual friend on a yet to be named social networking site.

Along with the rise of apparent hate crimes since the election of the country’s first black president, the global financial crisis and the Bernard Madoff financial scandal also have spawned a growth in anti-Semitic hostility, the report states. Yahoo! Finance has reported a doubling of anti-Semitic comments on message boards, prompting the Internet portal to increase monitoring of finance and message boards and to delete offensive comment.

Numerous white supremacist groups and individuals also have utilized video-sharing websites, such as YouTube and MySpace Video, as an effective means to promote hateful material that might not otherwise reach the public.

Not surprisingly, extremist websites are also reformatting their websites to keep pace with the popularity of mobile devices such as BlackBerries and iPhones. Stormfront and Vanguard News Network, two of the most popular white supremacist forums on the Internet, are fully accessible and searchable by cell phone.

The report points out that hate speech, which is usually protected under the First Amendment, internet activity, is now often being used to intimidate and harass individuals on the basis of their race, religion, sexual orientation or national origin, which are acts that qualify as criminal conduct not protected by the First Amendment.

Actual criminal cases regarding the Internet, however, have been few in number due to the nature of the Internet which is “vast and perpetrators of online hate crimes hide behind anonymous screen names, electronically garbled addresses, and websites that can be relocated and abandoned overnight,” the report states.

Those who send threatening e-mail communications through the Internet may convey these messages anonymously across state lines to victims in another part of the country. “Prosecutors face the daunting task of identifying the perpetrator, collecting and preserving evidence, and establishing jurisdiction over the criminal act,” according to the report. 

Allen McDuffee writes on politics for publications such as The Nation, Mother Jones and New York Observer. He is currently working on a book project, No Child Left Unrecruited, and blogs at www.governmentalityblog.com. He lives in Brooklyn, N.Y.

Marisa Faitelson is a New York-based researcher.


 

is a New York-based researcher. 
 
Comments (7)
racism
7 Friday, 04 December 2009 12:39
jermaine
i am doing a essay on racism but have to do two sided arguments. would anyone say there are white hate groups in the past and present as well as black hate groups.because fom what i see it's only black hate groups. can anyone help by confriming this or elaberating on it for me. thsi is not to offend anyone so that you are aware.
Supremacy?
6 Monday, 19 October 2009 15:48
Jimster1956
For any race or group to be supreme, there has to be another group that is inferior. People are people are people. All equal, all sharing the same green Earth. For a group to be inferiorly perceived, they must be oppressed by another group claiming superiority. Manufactured hatred and racism is used as with any propaganda. If intelligent people gave no credance to it, their rants become as effective as a dog barking at a passing fire truck to stop it. Whether the supremist organization is the neo-nazis, the KKK or the racist hate mongering NAACP, once that organization has a voice and a following, counter voices must rise up to quell the threat. Unfortunately, these miscreants all know how to act just within the limits of the law to avoid prosecution, usually. And that thanks to the lawyers who jettison what is morally right for a buck.
WHY ARE BLACKS OPRESSED?
5 Saturday, 12 September 2009 15:57
WHITE COMMUNITY ACTIVIST
Its from years of being programed that they are disenfranchised, oppressed by liberals in the democratic party.From this the liberals feed them this lie make them feel they cannot depend on themselves but only the government for help.Sure, the Liberals throw a few community projects their way make them feel like they are "giving back" but in reality they are buying votes by keeping them where they are at. So how do else do Liberals hold them down? They unite them under a common threat "White Supremacists" yup according to the article they are everywhere.Liberals like to label conservatives as "racists" And they probably believe all 30,000 of the Tea Party goers fall under this category, but they are not.There is nothing racist about living a crime free life, owning a home and starting a honest business without being taxed. If the black community can wake up and see they are enslaving themselves, by stop defining their life as being victims, and start identifying themselves as Americans contributing to society and not a drain, they can break that hold.
Yes thats my name
4 Saturday, 12 September 2009 15:43
White community activist
I find it hilarious that they actually did a accurate, independent study on the issue.They must have jotted that down after watching MSNBC, this is exactly the type of "shit stirring" that make people like Jesse Jackson wealthy, false claims of racists and racism, it lessons their case and makes them look utterly ridiculous.If they want to go that route just look at the black citizens being murdered everyday by other blacks who are terrorizing there communities, not white supremecists.
More Government Propaganda
3 Saturday, 05 September 2009 11:57
anonymous
The present Nazi Government like all the Nazi Governments before it seeks to quell free speech. Free speech is the enemy of totalitarianism. This "report" and the groups behind it appear very shady.

This is an attempt to scare non-white people, specifically those named as victims in the "report", into backing the government's play on the first amendment. You cannot have people speaking their minds in a free society. It cannot be tolerated.

So now, the first step is to have all kinds of people screaming about heightened anxiety, and I'm intimidated, and they are scaring me, and blah blah blah. Next, they will start saying the gov't needs to do something, there ought to be a law, and a movement will develop.

Then when the gov't violently attacks targeted groups they will be able to say: "This is what the people wanted. This is what you voted for." Nefarious gov'ts always try to hook-it-up like their evil is what the people want.

At the same time they use one group of special interest to scare non-whites there will be another group of special interest scaring white people. Here in Baltimore you have these bull horn and radio activist telling black people the whites are going to get us! The whites are going to get us! The whites are going to get us! Then you have officials of the gov't telling white people the gangs are going to get us! The gangs are going to get us! The gangs are going to get us!

This all works very well for the government. As long as they can keep people divided and suspicious based on race, class, religion, hair length, shoe size, favorite flavor of ice cream, whatever - they can stick it to us all.

And we the people will never be able to mount any type of significant challenge to the governmental aristocracy and their looting and killing.
Curious
2 Friday, 04 September 2009 11:03
John
I'm just curious? Has anyone done a study to see if there is any growth in liberal leaning Civil Rights Organizations or Black hate groups?
Do Crips, bloods, black guerilla family or ms13 qualify as hate groups or are they just fun loving kids?
As long as they can keep proving that white racism is wide spread and growing by leaps and bounds, they can keep the checks rolling in.
When fatigue wearing black men harass white voters in Philly while wielding batons, that doesn't constitute a growing number of Black hate groups does it?
Or is it no one is counting any hate groups unless they are all white guys?
Hate "speech"
1 Wednesday, 02 September 2009 22:05
William Broom
In additon to this article, NYTimes columnist Tim Eagan tells us this morning of a Republican candidate for Governor in Idaho who appears to feel quite empowered by all this hate on the web.

Eagan writes: "A Republican candidate for governor of Idaho, Rex Rammell, was at a political barbecue last week when somebody brought up the tags used by wolf hunters, and then made a reference to killing the president of the United States.

“Obama tags?” Rammell replied, to laughter, according to an account in The Times-News of Twin Falls. “We’d buy some of those.”

I fear a climate where people like Rammell feel so empowered by their "community" to express their hatred so openly. My anxiety is amplified when the hate is spread by pretend “Patriots” who seem to have struck a populist chord.

I like to remind the firearms-loving brand of Tea Partiers that the important difference between now and the real American Revolution is the inconvenient truth that today we have neither troops stationed in our homes — nor taxation without a vote in the matter.

I also like to remind them that losing a legitimate election (as opposed to winning in 2000 via the Supreme Court) is no reason to run around pretending to be Patrick Henry.

Yes we have taxation, but we also have representation, lots of it — local, state and federal. So please spare us all the talk of “Tyranny” and "watering the Tree of Liberty with the blood of tyrants." Considering the armament displayed at certain town meetings, I take it as a threat, not rhetoric. (PS I'm a gun owner myself, and would never consider showing up at a community meeting with such a thing).

Meanwhile, calling your duly-elected president a “nazi” (wether you voted for him or not) is downright UN-PATRIOTIC. Such speech may be “free” but it doesn’t make up for how truly corrosive it is to a nation. We are a country that tolerates political differences and protects the rights of those in the minority party until they rise again. That's real patriotism.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment (you may use HTML tags here):
mlist
Spot Crime 1

Designed By

Most Read Stories

Bop


Crimeticker, powered by http://spotcrime.com