FACEBOOK, MYSPACE FUEL GROWTH OF ORGANIZATIONS DEDICATE TO HATE
By Allen McDuffee and Marisa Faitelson
The number of white supremacist organizations in the United States has more than doubled since the beginning of the decade, according to a recently issued report by a civil rights organization.
A study by the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights Education Fund concluded that since 2000 the number of U.S.-based white supremacist groups has increased 54 percent — fueled by the ease of communicating on the Internet and social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace.
The report, “Confronting the New Faces of Hate: Hate Crimes in America, 2009,” was produced by the LCCREF — a coalition of more than 200 organizations, a dozen of which contributed to this report.
The LCCREF report warns that although the election of President Barack Obama “appeared to close the book” on the history of inequality in America, a “spate of racially-motivated hate crimes and violence against minorities and immigrants that occurred before and after Election Day makes clear that a final victory over prejudice and racial hostility remains elusive.”
The LCCREF report, citing 2007 FBI statistics, points out that approximately 51 percent of the reported hate crimes were race-based, with 18.4 percent on the basis of religion, 16.6 percent on basis of sexual orientation and 13.2 on the basis of ethnicity. FBI statistics also reveal that the overwhelming majority of race-based crimes were directed against blacks (69 percent), followed by crimes against whites (19 percent), followed by crimes against Asians or Pacific Islanders (4.9 percent).
Driving the growth of extremists' groups is the ease of communication and building digital communities on the Internet. No longer limited to passing out leaflets on street corners, hate groups now reach potential audiences of millions by facilitating “communication among like-minded bigots across borders and oceans, anonymously and cheaply enhancing their ability to promote and recruit for their cause,” the report says.
Social networking sites also have bolstered the effort to recruit new members. According to the report, sites such as MySpace and Facebook, as well as extremist sites such as NewSaxon attract thousands of white supremacists, allowing like-minded individuals to form larger communities faster and more efficiently than web-based forums or discussion groups. The report cites the case of two white supremacists arrested in the fall of 2008 for plotting a racist shooting spree and assassination attempt on Obama who were reportedly introduced to each other by a mutual friend on a yet to be named social networking site.
Along with the rise of apparent hate crimes since the election of the country’s first black president, the global financial crisis and the Bernard Madoff financial scandal also have spawned a growth in anti-Semitic hostility, the report states. Yahoo! Finance has reported a doubling of anti-Semitic comments on message boards, prompting the Internet portal to increase monitoring of finance and message boards and to delete offensive comment.
Numerous white supremacist groups and individuals also have utilized video-sharing websites, such as YouTube and MySpace Video, as an effective means to promote hateful material that might not otherwise reach the public.
Not surprisingly, extremist websites are also reformatting their websites to keep pace with the popularity of mobile devices such as BlackBerries and iPhones. Stormfront and Vanguard News Network, two of the most popular white supremacist forums on the Internet, are fully accessible and searchable by cell phone.
The report points out that hate speech, which is usually protected under the First Amendment, internet activity, is now often being used to intimidate and harass individuals on the basis of their race, religion, sexual orientation or national origin, which are acts that qualify as criminal conduct not protected by the First Amendment.
Actual criminal cases regarding the Internet, however, have been few in number due to the nature of the Internet which is “vast and perpetrators of online hate crimes hide behind anonymous screen names, electronically garbled addresses, and websites that can be relocated and abandoned overnight,” the report states.
Those who send threatening e-mail communications through the Internet may convey these messages anonymously across state lines to victims in another part of the country. “Prosecutors face the daunting task of identifying the perpetrator, collecting and preserving evidence, and establishing jurisdiction over the criminal act,” according to the report.
Allen McDuffee writes on politics for publications such as The Nation, Mother Jones and New York Observer. He is currently working on a book project, No Child Left Unrecruited, and blogs at www.governmentalityblog.com. He lives in Brooklyn, N.Y.
Marisa Faitelson is a New York-based researcher.







This is an attempt to scare non-white people, specifically those named as victims in the "report", into backing the government's play on the first amendment. You cannot have people speaking their minds in a free society. It cannot be tolerated.
So now, the first step is to have all kinds of people screaming about heightened anxiety, and I'm intimidated, and they are scaring me, and blah blah blah. Next, they will start saying the gov't needs to do something, there ought to be a law, and a movement will develop.
Then when the gov't violently attacks targeted groups they will be able to say: "This is what the people wanted. This is what you voted for." Nefarious gov'ts always try to hook-it-up like their evil is what the people want.
At the same time they use one group of special interest to scare non-whites there will be another group of special interest scaring white people. Here in Baltimore you have these bull horn and radio activist telling black people the whites are going to get us! The whites are going to get us! The whites are going to get us! Then you have officials of the gov't telling white people the gangs are going to get us! The gangs are going to get us! The gangs are going to get us!
This all works very well for the government. As long as they can keep people divided and suspicious based on race, class, religion, hair length, shoe size, favorite flavor of ice cream, whatever - they can stick it to us all.
And we the people will never be able to mount any type of significant challenge to the governmental aristocracy and their looting and killing.
Do Crips, bloods, black guerilla family or ms13 qualify as hate groups or are they just fun loving kids?
As long as they can keep proving that white racism is wide spread and growing by leaps and bounds, they can keep the checks rolling in.
When fatigue wearing black men harass white voters in Philly while wielding batons, that doesn't constitute a growing number of Black hate groups does it?
Or is it no one is counting any hate groups unless they are all white guys?
Eagan writes: "A Republican candidate for governor of Idaho, Rex Rammell, was at a political barbecue last week when somebody brought up the tags used by wolf hunters, and then made a reference to killing the president of the United States.
“Obama tags?” Rammell replied, to laughter, according to an account in The Times-News of Twin Falls. “We’d buy some of those.”
I fear a climate where people like Rammell feel so empowered by their "community" to express their hatred so openly. My anxiety is amplified when the hate is spread by pretend “Patriots” who seem to have struck a populist chord.
I like to remind the firearms-loving brand of Tea Partiers that the important difference between now and the real American Revolution is the inconvenient truth that today we have neither troops stationed in our homes — nor taxation without a vote in the matter.
I also like to remind them that losing a legitimate election (as opposed to winning in 2000 via the Supreme Court) is no reason to run around pretending to be Patrick Henry.
Yes we have taxation, but we also have representation, lots of it — local, state and federal. So please spare us all the talk of “Tyranny” and "watering the Tree of Liberty with the blood of tyrants." Considering the armament displayed at certain town meetings, I take it as a threat, not rhetoric. (PS I'm a gun owner myself, and would never consider showing up at a community meeting with such a thing).
Meanwhile, calling your duly-elected president a “nazi” (wether you voted for him or not) is downright UN-PATRIOTIC. Such speech may be “free” but it doesn’t make up for how truly corrosive it is to a nation. We are a country that tolerates political differences and protects the rights of those in the minority party until they rise again. That's real patriotism.