NEWS FLASH - Former ACORN employees plan to file criminal complaint against creators of controversial videos

E-mail Print
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 

By Stephen Janis

Former employees of the beleaguered community activist group ACORN are planning to file a criminal complaint in Baltimore against the creators of the series of videos that have spurred outrage against the organization, sources have told Investigative Voice.

The filing could come as soon as Friday afternoon, sources said.

The criminal complaint will allege that recordings of the group’s employees giving advice on how to evade taxes and house underage South American sex workers to journalists posing as a pimp and prostitute were obtained illegally.

The criminal complaint is expected to name both James O’Keefe, 25, and Hannah Giles, 20, along with the owner of the website Breitbart, which initially released the videos.

ACORN is also contemplating a civil suit seeking an injunction against O'Keefe and Giles to prevent them from distributing the videos, according to an an email.

The pair, posed as a pimp and prostitute visiting ACORN offices around the country, duping employees of the tenant’s rights organization into giving advice on how to avoid paying taxes on illicit earnings from underage prostitutes. The duo also sought and received counsel on how to claim the underage sex workers as dependents while keeping their earnings.

The pair released the videos on the internet, which were subsequently broadcast on major news networks -- prompting outrage and calls for authorities to investigate employees of ACORN, an acronym for Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

ACORN fired the two Baltimore-based workers depicted in the video shortly after it was released.

The criminal complaints will be filed by the same two employees of Baltimore’s ACORN office shown in the first video O'Keefe and Giles released.

Maryland’s “Wiretap Act” prohibits making an audio recording of a person without their consent.

The law states that it is illegal to “willfully intercept, endeavor to intercept, or procure any other person to intercept any wire, oral, or electronic communications.” The law bars distribution of any illegally obtained recordings, a part of the statute ACORN lawyers plan to use to enjoin the videos from being distributed further.

Once a person files a criminal complaint, it is up to prosecutors to decide if charges can go forward.

Representatives of ACORN did not return calls for comment.

Since the release of a series of videos depicting ACORN employees giving advice to the duo, the group has been under fire from politicians and pundits alike.

Earlier this week, the U.S. Senate voted to ban ACORN from receiving federal funding.  Wednesday the House of Representatives adopted a similar measure.

Several member of congress, including Maryland representative Roscoe Bartlett, have called for a federal investigation into ACORN’s activities. 

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Comments (7)
Acorn is full of it!
7 Friday, 18 September 2009 17:34
KottaMan
What a load of crap. Typical left-wing diversion tactics to get folks off of the real issue which is ACORN's very checkered past. Voter fraud is alive and well in Acorn-land. Now they are bagged counseling people how to further an "ongoing criminal enterprise" replete with "underage" girls as whores. ACORN is the real prostitute here. Do we really need these people "assisting" with the 2010 U.S. Census? Cut their federal funding. Maybe I should file a lawsuit, as a U.S. taxpayer alleging that ACORN has committed "unjust enrichment" by stealing my tax dollars for illegal purposes such as counseling potential pimps and prostitutes.
ACORN is legal
6 Friday, 18 September 2009 15:41
Jerome
I think some posters are mistaken, I just called the state of MD and they ACORN is operating legally.....stop being like fox, check your own facts
ACORN's state charter?
5 Friday, 18 September 2009 14:29
Hamish2112
How can ACORN sue in a state they aren't allowed to operate in, legally? They have been without state charter in MD for at least a year, maybe more...

http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2009/09/15/exclusive-by-mike-roman-acorn-operating-illegally-in-maryland/
Dang.
4 Friday, 18 September 2009 11:41
Paul_D
They should of had Linda Tripp record it. The law only applies to some when it comes to manafacturing outrage.
What?
3 Friday, 18 September 2009 11:15
JM
beleaguered and duped? Give me a break. Why didn't you write about the story before this write up? Seems the City gave up on prosecuting already. Why don't they just ask for foregiveness and move on to an honest living.
"Breitbart"
2 Friday, 18 September 2009 08:15
Tom H.
Does this somehow make them less culpable and despicable? Were they somehow faking it and messing with these people? I'm no conservative witch hunter, but this seems pretty clear cut and inexcusable.
wiretapping laws
1 Friday, 18 September 2009 08:14
jackie
Laws need to be changed concerning the laws when it comes to filming criminals.
Laws already favor criminals and it needs to stop.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment (you may use HTML tags here):
mlist
Spot Crime 1

Designed By

Most Read Stories

Bop


Crimeticker, powered by http://spotcrime.com